Skip to content

A Guide to (Typed) Reactive Forms in Angular - Part I (The Basics)

When building a simple form with Angular, such as a login form, you might choose a template-driven approach, which is defined through directives in the template and requires minimal boilerplate. A barebone login form using a template-driven approach could look like the following:

<!-- login.component.html -->
<form name="form" (ngSubmit)="myAuthenticationService.login(credentials)">
    <label for="email">E-mail</label>
    <input type="email" id="email" [(ngModel)]="credentials.email" required email />
    <label for="password">Password</label>
        <input type="password" id="password" [(ngModel)]="credentials.password" required />
    <button type="submit">Login!</button>
</form>
// login.component.ts
import { Component } from '@angular/core';

@Component({
  selector: 'app-login',
  templateUrl: './login.component.html'
})

export class LoginComponent implements OnInit {
  public credentials = {
    email: '',
    password: ''
  };

  constructor(public myAuthenticationService: MyAuthenticationService) { }
}

However, when working on a user input-heavy application requiring complex validation, dynamic fields, or a variety of different forms, the template-driven approach may prove insufficient. This is where reactive forms come into play.

Reactive forms employ a reactive approach, in which the form is defined using a set of form controls and form groups. Form data and validation logic are managed in the component class, which updates the view as the user interacts with the form fields. This approach requires more boilerplate but offers greater explicitness and flexibility.

In this three-part blog series, we will dive into the reactive forms data structures, learn how to build dynamic super forms, and how to create custom form controls.

In this first post, we will familiarize ourselves with the three data structures from the @angular/forms module:

FormControl

The FormControl class in Angular represents a single form control element, such as an input, select, or textarea. It is used to track the value, validation status, and user interactions of a single form control. To create an instance of a form control, the FormControl class has a constructor that takes an optional initial value, which sets the starting value of the form control. Additionally, the class has various methods and properties that allow you to interact with and control the form control, such as setting its value, disabling it, or subscribing to value changes.

As of Angular version 14, the FormControl class has been updated to include support for typed reactive forms - a feature the Angular community has been wanting for a while. This means that it is now a generic class that allows you to specify the type of value that the form control will work with using the type parameter <TValue>. By default, TValue is set to any, so if you don't specify a type, the form control will function as an untyped control.

If you have ever updated your Angular project with ng cli to version 14 or above, you could have also seen an UntypedFormControl class. The reason for having a UntypedFormControl class is to support incremental migration to typed forms. It also allows you to enable types for your form controls after automatic migration.

Here is an example of how you may initialize a FormControl in your component.

import { FormControl } from '@angular/forms';

const nameControl = new FormControl<string>("John Doe");

Our form control, in this case, will work with string values and have a default value of "John Doe".

If you want to see the full implementation of the FormControl class, you can check out the Angular docs!

FormGroup

A FormGroup is a class used to group several FormControl instances together. It allows you to create complex forms by organizing multiple form controls into a single object. The FormGroup class also provides a way to track the overall validation status of the group of form controls, as well as the value of the group as a whole.

A FormGroup instance can be created by passing in a collection of FormControl instances as the group's controls. The group's controls can be accessed by their names, just like the controls in the group.

As an example, we can rewrite the login form presented earlier to use reactive forms and group our two form controls together in a FormGroup instance:

// login.component.ts
import { FormControl, FormGroup, Validators } from '@angular/forms';

@Component({
  selector: 'app-login',
  templateUrl: './login.component.html'
})

export class LoginComponent implements OnInit {
  public form = new FormGroup({
    email: new FormControl<string>('', [Validators.required, Validators.email]),
    password: new FormControl<string>('', [Validators.required]),
  });

  constructor(public myAuthenticationService: MyAuthenticationService) { }

  public login() {

    // if you hover over "email" and "password" in your IDE, you should see their type is inferred
    console.log({
      email: this.form.value.email,
      password: this.form.value.password
    });

    this.myAuthenticationService.login(this.form.value);
  }

}
<!-- login.component.html -->
<form name="form" (ngSubmit)="login()" [formGroup]="form">
    <label for="email">E-mail</label>
    <input type="email" id="email" formControlName="email" />
    <label for="password">Password</label>
        <input type="password" id="password" formControlName="password" />
    <button type="submit">Login!</button>
</form>

Notice we have to specify a formGroup and a formControlName to map the markup to our reactive form. You could also use a formControl directive instead of formControlName, and provide the FormControl instance directly.

FormArray

As the name suggests, similar to FormGroup, a FormArray is a class used to group form controls, but is used to group them in a collection rather than a group.

In most cases, you will default to using a FormGroup but a FormArray may come in handy when you find yourself in a highly dynamic situation where you don't know the number of form controls and their names up front.

One use case where it makes sense to resort to using FormArray is when you allow users to add to a list and define some values inside of that list. Let's take a TODO app as an example:

import { Component } from '@angular/core';
import { FormArray, FormControl, FormGroup } from '@angular/forms';

@Component({
  selector: 'app-todo-list',
  template: `
    <form [formGroup]="todoForm">
      <div formArrayName="todos">
        <div *ngFor="let todo of todos.controls; let i = index">
          <input [formControlName]="i" placeholder="Enter TODO name" />
        </div>
      </div>
      <button (click)="addTodo()">Add TODO</button>
    </form>
  `,
})
export class TodoListComponent {
  public todos = new FormArray<FormControl<string | null>>([]);

  public todoForm = new FormGroup({
    todos: this.todos,
  });

  addTodo() {
    this.todoForm.controls['todos'].push(new FormControl<string>(''));
  }
}

In both of the examples provided, we instantiate FormGroup directly. However, some developers prefer to pre-declare the form group and assign it within the ngOnInit method. This is usually done as follows:

// login.component.ts
import { FormControl, FormGroup, Validators } from '@angular/forms';

@Component({
  selector: 'app-login',
  templateUrl: './login.component.html'
})

export class LoginComponent implements OnInit {
  // predeclare the form group
  public form: FormGroup;

  constructor(public myAuthenticationService: MyAuthenticationService) { }

  ngOnInit() {
    // assign in ngOnInit
    this.form = new FormGroup({
      email: new FormControl<string>('', [Validators.required, Validators.email]),
      password: new FormControl<string>('', [Validators.required]),
    });
  }

  public login() {
    // no type inference :(
    console.log(this.form.value.email);
  }

}

If you try the above example in your IDE, you'll notice that the type of this.form.value is no longer inferred, and you won't get autocompletion for methods such as patchValue. This is because the FormGroup type defaults to FormGroup<any>. To get the right types, you can either assign the form group directly or explicitly declare the generics like so:

public form: FormGroup<{
  email: FormControl<string>,
  password: FormControl<string>,
}>;

However, explicitly typing all your forms like this can be inconvenient and I would advise you to avoid pre-declaring your FormGroups if you can help it.

In the next blog post, we will learn a way to construct dynamic super forms with minimal boilerplate.

This Dot Labs is a development consultancy that is trusted by top industry companies, including Stripe, Xero, Wikimedia, Docusign, and Twilio. This Dot takes a hands-on approach by providing tailored development strategies to help you approach your most pressing challenges with clarity and confidence. Whether it's bridging the gap between business and technology or modernizing legacy systems, you’ll find a breadth of experience and knowledge you need. Check out how This Dot Labs can empower your tech journey.

You might also like

A Guide to Custom Angular Attribute Directives cover image

A Guide to Custom Angular Attribute Directives

When working inside of Angular applications you may have noticed special attributes such as NgClass, NgStyle and NgModel. These are special attributes that you can add to elements and components that are known as attribute directives. In this article, I will cover how these attributes are created and show a couple of examples. What are Attribute Directives? Angular directives are special constructs that allow modification of HTML elements and components. Attribute directives are also applied through attributes, hence the name. There exist other types of directives such as structural directives as well, but we’re just going to focus on attribute directives. If you’ve used Angular before then you have almost certainly used a couple of the attribute directives I mentioned earlier before. You are not limited to just the built-in directives though. Angular allows you to create your own! Creating Attribute Directives Directives can be created using code generation via the ng CLI tool. ` ng generate directive ` This will create a file to house your directive and also an accompanying test file as well. The contents of the directive are very barebones to start with. Let’s take a look. ` import { Directive } from '@angular/core'; @Directive({ selector: '[appExample]', }) export class ExampleDirective { constructor() {} } ` You will see here that directives are created using a @Directive decorator. The selector in this case is the name of the attribute as it is intended to be used in your templates. The square brackets around the name make it an attribute selector, which is what we want for a custom attribute directive. I would also recommend that a prefix is always used for directive names to minimize the risk of conflicts. It should also go without saying to avoid using the ng prefix for custom directives to avoid confusion. Now, let’s go over the lifecycle of a directive. The constructor is called with a reference to the ElementRef that the directive was bound to. You can do any initialization here if needed. This element reference is dependency injected, and will be available outside the constructor as well. You can also set up @HostListener handlers if you need to add functionality that runs in response to user interaction with the element or component, and @Input properties if you need to pass data to the directive. Click Away Directive One useful directive that doesn’t come standard is a click away directive. This is one that I have used before in my projects, and is very easy to understand. This directive uses host listeners to listen for user input, and determine whether the element that directive is attached to should be visible or not after the click event occurs. ` @Directive({ selector: '[appClickAway]', }) export class ClickAwayDirective { @Output() onClickAway: EventEmitter = new EventEmitter(); constructor(private elementRef: ElementRef) {} @HostListener('document:click', ['$event']) onClick(event: PointerEvent): void { if (!this.elementRef.nativeElement.contains(event.target)) { this.onClickAway.emit(event); } } } ` There are a few new things in this directive we’ll briefly go over. The first thing is the event emitter output onClickAway. A generic directive isn’t going to know how to handle click away behavior by itself as this will change based on your use case when using the directive. To solve this issue, we make the directive emit an event that the user of the directive can listen for. The other part is the click handler. We use @HostListener to attach a click handler so we can run our click away logic whenever clicks are done. The one interesting thing about this directive is that it listens to all click events since we’ve specified ‘document’ in the first parameter. The reason for this is because we care about listening for clicking anything that isn’t the element or component that the directive is attached to. If we didn’t do this, then the event handler would only fire when clicking on the component the directive is attached to, which defeats the purpose of a click away handler. Once we’ve determined the element was not clicked, we emit the aforementioned event. Using this directive makes it trivial to implement click away functionality for both modals and context menus alike. If we have a custom dialog component we could hook it up like this: ` Dialog Box This is a paragraph with content! ` If you want to see this directive in action, then you can find it in our blog demos repo here. Drag and Drop Directive Another useful directive is one that assists with drag and drop operations. The following directive makes elements draggable, and executes a function with a reference to the location where the element was dragged to. ` @Directive({ selector: '[appDragDrop]', }) export class DragDropDirective implements OnInit, OnDestroy { @Output() onDragDrop: EventEmitter = new EventEmitter(); mouseDown$ = new Subject(); mouseUp$ = new Subject(); destroy$ = new Subject(); constructor(private elementRef: ElementRef) {} ngOnInit(): void { this.mouseDown$ .pipe(takeUntil(this.destroy$)) .pipe(exhaustMap(() => this.mouseUp$.pipe(take(1)))) .subscribe((event) => { if ( event.target && event.target instanceof Element && !this.elementRef.nativeElement.contains(event.target) ) { this.onDragDrop.emit(event); } }); } ngOnDestroy(): void { this.destroy$.next(null); this.destroy$.complete(); } @HostListener('mousedown', ['$event']) onMouseDown(event: MouseEvent): void { this.mouseDown$.next(event); } @HostListener('document:mouseup', ['$event']) onMouseUp(event: MouseEvent): void { this.mouseUp$.next(event); } } ` Just like the previous directive example an event emitter is used so the user of the directive can associate custom functionality with it. RxJs is also utilized for the drag and drop detection. This directive uses the exhaustMap function to create an observable that emits both after a mouse down, and finally a mouse up is done. With that observable, we can subscribe to it and call the drag and drop callback so long as the element that’s dragged on isn’t the component itself. Note how the mouse down event is local to the component while the mouse up event is attached to the document. For mouse down, this is done since we only want the start of the dragging to be initiated from clicking the component itself. The mouse up must listen to the document since the dragging has to end on something that isn’t the component that we’re dragging. Just like the previous directive, we simply need to reference the attribute and register an event handler. ` Drag me over something! ` Conclusion In this article, we have learned how to write our own custom attribute directives and demonstrated a couple of practical examples of directives you might use or encounter in the real world. I hope you found this introduction to directives useful, and that it helps you with writing your own directives in the future! You can find the examples shown here in our blog demos repository if you want to use them yourself....

Angular 17: Continuing the Renaissance cover image

Angular 17: Continuing the Renaissance

Angular 17: A New Era November 8th marked a significant milestone in the world of Angular with the release of Angular 17. This wasn't just any ordinary update; it was a leap forward, signifying a new chapter for the popular framework. But what made this release truly stand out was the unveiling of Angular's revamped website, complete with a fresh brand identity and a new logo. This significant transformation represents the evolving nature of Angular, aligning with the modern demands of web development. To commemorate this launch, we also hosted a release afterparty, where we went deep into its new features with Minko Gechev from the Angular core team, and Google Developer Experts (GDEs) Brandon Roberts, Deborah Kurata, and Enea Jahollari. But what exactly are these notable new features in the latest version? Let's dive in and explore. The Angular Renaissance Angular has been undergoing a significant revival, often referred to as Angular's renaissance, a term coined by Sarah Drasner, the Director of Engineering at Google, earlier this year. This revival has been particularly evident in its recent versions. The Angular team has worked hard to introduce many new improvements, focusing on signal-based reactivity, hydration, server-side rendering, standalone components, and migrating to esbuild and Vite for a better and faster developer experience. This latest release, in particular, marks many of these features as production-ready. Standalone Components About a year ago, Angular began a journey toward modernity with the introduction of standalone components. This move significantly enhanced the developer experience, making Angular more contemporary and user-friendly. In Angular's context, a standalone component is a self-sufficient, reusable code unit that combines logic, data, and user interface elements. What sets these components apart is their independence from Angular's NgModule system, meaning they do not rely on it for configuration or dependencies. By setting a standalone: true` flag, you no longer need to embed your component in an NgModule and you can bootstrap directly off that component: `typescript // ./app/app.component.ts @Component({ selector: 'app', template: 'hello', standalone: true }) export class AppComponent {} // ./main.ts import { bootstrapApplication } from '@angular/platform-browser'; import { AppComponent } from './app/app.component'; bootstrapApplication(AppComponent).catch(e => console.error(e)); ` Compared to the NgModules way of adding components, as shown below, you can immediately see how standalone components make things much simpler. `ts // ./app/app.component.ts import { Component } from '@angular/core'; @Component({ selector: 'app-root', templateUrl: './app.component.html', styleUrls: ['./app.component.css'], }) export class AppComponent { title = 'CodeSandbox'; } // ./app/app.module.ts import { NgModule } from '@angular/core'; import { BrowserModule } from '@angular/platform-browser'; import { AppComponent } from './app.component'; @NgModule({ declarations: [ AppComponent ], imports: [ BrowserModule ], providers: [], bootstrap: [AppComponent] }) export class AppModule { } // .main.ts import { platformBrowserDynamic } from '@angular/platform-browser-dynamic'; import { AppModule } from './app/app.module'; platformBrowserDynamic() .bootstrapModule(AppModule) .catch((err) => console.error(err)); ` In this latest release, the Angular CLI now defaults to generating standalone components, directives, and pipes. This default setting underscores the shift towards a standalone-centric development approach in Angular. New Syntax for Enhanced Control Flow Angular 17 introduces a new syntax for control flow, replacing traditional structural directives like ngIf` or `ngFor`, which have been part of Angular since version 2. This new syntax is designed for fine-grained change detection and eventual zone-less operation when Angular completely migrates to signals. It's more streamlined and performance-efficient, making handling conditional or list content in templates easier. The @if` block replaces `*ngIf` for expressing conditional parts of the UI. `ts @if (a > b) { {{a}} is greater than {{b}} } @else if (b > a) { {{a}} is less than {{b}} } @else { {{a}} is equal to {{b}} } ` The @switch` block replaces `ngSwitch`, offering benefits such as not requiring a container element to hold the condition expression or each conditional template. It also supports template type-checking, including type narrowing within each branch. ```ts @switch (condition) { @case (caseA) { Case A. } @case (caseB) { Case B. } @default { Default case. } } ``` The @for` block replaces `*ngFor` for iteration and presents several differences compared to its structural directive predecessor, `ngFor`. For example, the tracking expression (calculating keys corresponding to object identities) is mandatory but offers better ergonomics. Additionally, it supports `@empty` blocks. `ts @for (item of items; track item.id) { {{ item.name }} } ` Defer Block for Lazy Loading Angular 17 introduces the @defer` block, a dramatically improving lazy loading of content within Angular applications. Within the `@defer` block framework, several sub-blocks are designed to elegantly manage different phases of the deferred loading process. The main content within the `@defer` block is the segment designated for lazy loading. Initially, this content is not rendered, becoming visible only when specific triggers are activated or conditions are met, and after the required dependencies have been loaded. By default, the trigger for a `@defer` block is the browser reaching an idle state. For instance, take the following block: it delays the loading of the calendar-imp` component until it comes into the viewport. Until that happens, a placeholder is shown. This placeholder displays a loading message when the `calendar-imp` component begins to load, and an error message if, for some reason, the component fails to load. `ts @defer (on viewport) { } @placeholder { Calendar placeholder } @loading { Loading calendar } @error { Error loading calendar } ` The on` keyword supports a wide a variety of other conditions, such as: - idle` (when the browser has reached an idle state) - interaction` (when the user interacts with a specified element) - hover` (when the mouse has hovered over a trigger area) - timer(x)` (triggers after a specified duration) - immediate` (triggers the deferred load immediately) The second option of configuring when deferring happens is by using the when` keyword. For example: `ts @defer (when isVisible) { } ` Server-Side Rendering (SSR) Angular 17 has made server-side rendering (SSR) much more straightforward. Now, a --ssr` option is included in the `ng new` command, removing the need for additional setup or configurations. When creating a new project with the `ng new` command, the CLI inquires if SSR should be enabled. As of version 17, the default response is set to 'No'. However, for version 18 and beyond, the plan is to enable SSR by default in newly generated applications. If you prefer to start with SSR right away, you can do so by initializing your project with the `--ssr` flag: `shell ng new --ssr ` For adding SSR to an already existing project, utilize the ng add` command of the Angular CLI: `shell ng add @angular/ssr ` Hydration In Angular 17, the process of hydration, which is essential for reviving a server-side rendered application on the client-side, has reached a stable, production-ready status. Hydration involves reusing the DOM structures rendered on the server, preserving the application's state, and transferring data retrieved from the server, among other crucial tasks. This functionality is automatically activated when server-side rendering (SSR) is used. It offers a more efficient approach than the previous method, where the server-rendered tree was completely replaced, often causing visible UI flickers. Such re-rendering can adversely affect Core Web Vitals, including Largest Contentful Paint (LCP), leading to layout shifts. By enabling hydration, Angular 17 allows for the reuse of the existing DOM, effectively preventing these flickers. Support for View Transitions The new View Transitions API, supported by some browsers, is now integrated into the Angular router. This feature, which must be activated using the withViewTransitions` function, allows for CSS-based animations during route transitions, adding a layer of visual appeal to applications. To use it, first you need to import withViewTransitions`: `ts import { provideRouter, withViewTransitions } from '@angular/router'; ` Then, you need to add it to the provideRouter` configuration: `ts bootstrapApplication(AppComponent, { providers: [ provideRouter(routes, withViewTransitions()) ] }) ` Other Notable Changes - Angular 17 has stabilized signals, initially introduced in Angular 16, providing a new method for state management in Angular apps. - Angular 17 no longer supports Node 16. The minimal Node version required is now 18.13. - TypeScript version 5.2 is the least supported version starting from this release of Angular. - The @Component` decorator now supports a `styleUrl` attribute. This allows for specifying a single stylesheet path as a string, simplifying the process of linking a component to a specific style sheet. Previously, even for a single stylesheet, an array was required under `styleUrls`. Conclusion With the launch of Angular 17, the Angular Renaissance is now in full swing. This release has garnered such positive feedback that developers are showing renewed interest in the framework and are looking forward to leveraging it in upcoming projects. However, it's important to note that it might take some time for IDEs to adapt to the new templating syntax fully. While this transition is underway, rest assured that you can still write perfectly valid code using the old templating syntax, as all the changes in Angular 17 are backward compatible. Looking ahead, the future of Angular appears brighter than ever, and we can't wait to see what the next release has in store!...

You Don't Need NgRx To Write a Good Angular App cover image

You Don't Need NgRx To Write a Good Angular App

NgRx is a great tool that allows you to manage state and side effects in Angular applications in a Redux-like manner. It streamlines state changes with its unidirectional data flow, and offers a structured approach to handling data and side effects. Numerous posts on our blog detail its strengths and affiliated techniques. Some Angular developers even argue that incorporating NgRx is imperative once an app expands beyond two features. While NgRx can undoubtedly enhance an Angular application or library by simplifying debugging, translating business logic into code, and improving the architecture, it does present a steep learning curve. Despite the provocative title, there is some truth to the statement: your app or library may indeed not need NgRx. Surprisingly, I successfully developed a suite of enterprise Angular libraries over five years without involving NgRx. In that project, we decided to opt out of using a state management library like NgRx because of its steep learning curve. Developers with varying levels of Angular expertise were involved, and the goal was to simplify their experience. My bold assertion is that, with careful consideration of architectural patterns, it is entirely possible to develop a robust app or library using only Angular, without any third-party libraries. Employing select design patterns and leveraging Angular's built-in tools can yield a highly maintainable app, even without a dedicated state management library. Having shared my somewhat audacious opinion, let me now support it by outlining a few patterns that facilitate the development of a maintainable, stateful Angular application or library without NgRx. Services and the Singleton Pattern Services provided in root` or a module yield a shared instance across the entire app or module, effectively rendering them singletons. This characteristic makes them ideal for managing and sharing state across components without requiring a dedicated state management tool like NgRx. Particularly, for small to medium-sized applications, a "state service" can be a straightforward and effective alternative to a comprehensive state management solution when implemented correctly. To accurately implement state in a singleton service, consider the following: - Restrict state data to private properties and expose them only through public methods or observables to prevent external mutations. Such a pattern safeguards the integrity of your state by averting unauthorized modifications. - Utilize BehaviorSubjects or signals to enable components to respond to state changes. Both BehaviorSubject` and `SettableSignal` retain the current value and emit it to new subscribers immediately. Components can then subscribe to these to receive the current value and any subsequent updates. - Expose public methods in your service that manage state modifications to centralize the logic for updating the state and incorporate validation, logging, or other necessary side effects. - When modifying state, always return a new instance of the data rather than altering the original data. This ensures that references are broken and components that rely on change detection can accurately detect changes. Good Component Architecture Distinguish your UI components into stateful (containers) and stateless (presentational) components. Stateful components manage data and logic, while stateless components merely receive data via inputs and emit events without maintaining an internal state. Do not get dragged into the rabbit hole of anti-patterns such as input drilling or event bubbling while trying to make as many components presentational as possible. Instead, use a Data Service Layer to provide a clean abstraction over backend API calls and handle error management, data transformation, caching, and even state management where it makes sense. Although injecting a service into a component technically categorizes it as a "smart" component, segregating the data access logic into a separate service layer ultimately enhances modularity, maintainability, scalability, and testability. Immutability A best practice is to always treat your state as immutable. Instead of modifying an object or an array directly, you should create a new copy with the changes. Adhering to immutability ensures predictability and can help in tracking changes. Applying the ChangeDetectionStrategy.OnPush strategy to components whenever possible is also a good idea as it not only optimizes performance since Angular only evaluates the component for changes when its inputs change or when a bound event is triggered, but it also enforces immutability. Change detection is only activated when a different object instance is passed to the input. Leveraging Angular Router Angular's router is a powerful tool for managing application state. It enables navigation between different parts of an application, allowing parameters to be passed along, effectively using the URL as a single source of truth for your application state, which makes the application more predictable, bookmarkable, and capable of maintaining state across reloads. Moreover, components can subscribe to URL changes and react accordingly. You can also employ router resolvers to fetch data before navigating to a route, ensuring that the necessary state is loaded before the route is activated. However, think carefully about what state you store in the URL; it should ideally only contain the state essential for navigating to a specific view of your application. More ephemeral states, like UI state, should be managed in components or services. Conclusion Angular provides lots of built-in tools and features you can effectively leverage to develop robust, maintainable applications without third-party state management libraries like NgRx. While NgRx is undoubtedly a valuable tool for managing state and side effects in large, complex applications, it may not be necessary for all projects. By employing thoughtful design patterns, such as the Singleton Pattern, adhering to principles of immutability, and leveraging Angular's built-in tools like the Router and Services, you can build a highly maintainable and stateful Angular application or library....

Software Team Leadership: Risk Taking & Decision Making with David Cramer, Co-Founder & CTO at Sentry cover image

Software Team Leadership: Risk Taking & Decision Making with David Cramer, Co-Founder & CTO at Sentry

In this episode of the engineering leadership series, Rob Ocel interviews David Cramer, co-founder and CTO of Sentry, delving into the importance of decision-making, risk-taking, and the challenges faced in the software engineering industry. David emphasizes the significance of having conviction and being willing to make decisions, even if they turn out to be wrong. He shares his experience of attending a CEO event, where he discovered that decision-making and conflict resolution are struggles even for successful individuals. David highlights the importance of making decisions quickly and accepting the associated risks, rather than attempting to pursue multiple options simultaneously. He believes that being decisive is crucial in the fast-paced software engineering industry. This approach allows for faster progress and adaptation, even if it means occasionally making mistakes along the way. The success of Sentry is attributed to a combination of factors, including market opportunity and the team's principles and conviction. David acknowledges that bold ideas often carry a higher risk of failure, but if they do succeed, the outcome can be incredibly significant. This mindset has contributed to Sentry’s achievements in the industry. The interview also touches on the challenges of developing and defending opinions in the software engineering field. David acknowledges that it can be difficult to navigate differing viewpoints and conflicting ideas. However, he emphasizes the importance of standing by one's convictions and being open to constructive criticism and feedback. Throughout the conversation, David emphasizes the need for engineering leaders to be decisive and take calculated risks. He encourages leaders to trust their instincts and make decisions promptly, even if they are uncertain about the outcome. This approach fosters a culture of innovation and progress within engineering teams. The episode provides valuable insights into the decision-making process and the challenges faced by engineering leaders. It highlights the importance of conviction, risk-taking, and the ability to make decisions quickly in the software engineering industry. David's experiences and perspectives offer valuable lessons for aspiring engineering leaders looking to navigate the complexities of the field....