Javascript

Introduction to LitElement

Published Feb 8, 2021

Updated Mar 23, 2023

3 min read

This article was written over 18 months ago and may contain information that is out of date. Some content may be relevant but please refer to the relevant official documentation or available resources for the latest information.

The use of powerful frameworks and libraries is very widespread nowadays. We can name Angular, React.js, Vue, Svelte, among others.

It's hard to imagine building a web application without the use of any of these component-based frameworks. For these options, the components are reusable and configurable widgets. They are able to provide a custom behavior and styling and they're used as building blocks for the application.

Can we share a component between these frameworks? The short answer is no. Every framework/library has a custom API definition to build components and they are not interoperable with each other.

What is LitElement?

According to the official LitElement website:

LitElement is a simple base class for creating fast, lightweight web components that work in any web page with any framework.

That means we can use the OOP (Object-Oriented Programming) paradigm using JavaScript or even better: TypeScript.

JavaScript vs TypeScript

To create your first custom Web Component using JavaScript, you'll need to define a class that implements the appearance and functionality of it as follows:

import { LitElement, html } from 'lit-element';

class HelloComponent extends LitElement {
  static get properties() {
    return { name: { type: String } };
  }

  constructor() {
    super();
    this.name = 'Luis'; // Set a default value here
  }

  // Defines a template to be "rendered" as part of the component.
  render() { 
    return html`Hello ${this.name}. Welcome to LitElement!`;
  }
}

// Register as a custom element named <hello-component>
customElements.define('hello-component', HelloComponent);

Now let's see how you can write your first Web Component using the power of TypeScript:

import { LitElement, html, property, customElement } from 'lit-element';

//Decorator that register as a custom element named <hello-component>
@customElement('hello-component') 
export class HelloComponent extends LitElement {
  // You can assign the default value here.
  @property({type: String}) name = 'Luis'; 

  // Defines a template to be "rendered" as part of the component.
  render() { 
    return html`Hello, ${this.name}. Welcome to LitElement!</p>`;
  }
}

As you may note, the use of TypeScript decorators will provide the ability to annotate the class declarations and members.

In the next section, you can find more articles to learn and get started with LitElement and TypeScript.

More about LitElement

In the past months, I've been publishing several articles about using LitElement with TypeScript. Also, I've been using these technologies actively to build Single-page applications, and I'm happy to share these resources with you:

More articles are coming soon! Do not miss any of them and visit the This Dot Blog to be up-to-date.

Feel free to reach out on Twitter if you have any questions. Follow me on GitHub to see more about my work.

This Dot is a consultancy dedicated to guiding companies through their modernization and digital transformation journeys. Specializing in replatforming, modernizing, and launching new initiatives, we stand out by taking true ownership of your engineering projects.

We love helping teams with projects that have missed their deadlines or helping keep your strategic digital initiatives on course. Check out our case studies and our clients that trust us with their engineering.

About the author(s)

Luis Aviles
Luis is a Senior Software Engineer and Google Developer Expert in Web Technologies and Angular. He is an author of online courses, technical articles, and a public speaker. He has participated in different international technology conferences, giving technical talks, workshops, and training sessions. He’s passionate about the developer community and he loves to help junior developers and professionals to improve their skills. When he’s not coding, Luis is doing photography or Astrophotography.
@luixaviles @luixaviles

End-to-end type-safety with JSON Schema

End-to-end type-safety with JSON Schema I recently wrote an introduction to JSON Schema post. If you’re unfamiliar with it, check out the post, but TLDR: It’s a schema specification that can be used to define the input and output data for your JSON API. In my post, I highlight many fantastic benefits you can reap from defining schemas for your JSON API. One of the more interesting things you can achieve with your schemas is end-to-end type safety from your backend API to your client application(s). In this post, we will explore how this can be accomplished slightly deeper. Overview The basic idea of what we want to achieve is: * a JSON API server that validates input and output data using JSON Schema * The JSON Schema definitions that our API uses transformed into TypeScript types With those pieces in place, we can achieve type safety on our API server and the consuming client application. The server side is pretty straightforward if you’re using a server like Fastify with already enabled JSON Schema support. This post will focus on the concepts more than the actual implementation details though. Here’s a simple diagram illustrating the high-level concept: We can share the schema and type declaration between the client and server. In that case, we can make a request to an endpoint where we know its type and schema, and assuming the server validates the data against the schema before sending it back to the client, our client can be confident about the type of the response data. Marrying JSON Schema and TypeScript There are a couple of different ways to accomplish this: * Generating types from schema definitions using code generation tools * Creating TypeBox definitions that can infer TypeScript types and be compiled to JSON Schema I recommend considering both and figuring out which would better fit your application and workflows. Like anything else, each has its own set of trade-offs. In my experience, I’ve found TypeBox to be the most compelling if you want to go deep with this pattern. Code generation A couple of different packages are available for generating TS types from JSON Schema definitions. * https://github.com/bcherny/json-schema-to-typescript * https://github.com/vega/ts-json-schema-generator They are CLI tools that you can provide a glob path to where your schema files are located and will generate TS declaration files to a specified output path. You can set up an npm hook or a similar type of script that will generate types for your development environment. TypeBox TypeBox is a JSON Schema type builder. With this approach, instead of json files, we define schemas in code using the TypeBox API. The TypeBox definitions infer to TypeScript types directly, which eliminates the code generation step described above. Here’s a simple example from the documentation of a JSON Schema definition declared with TypeBox: ` This can then be inferred as a TypeScript type: ` Aside from schemas and types, TypeBox can do a lot more to help us on our type-safety journey. We will explore it a bit more in upcoming sections. Sharing schemas between client and server applications Sharing our JSON Schema between our server and client app is the main requirement for end-to-end type-safety. There are a couple of different ways to accomplish this, but the simplest would be to set up our codebase as a monorepo that contains both the server and client app. Some popular options for TypeScript monorepos are: PNPM, Turborepo, and NX. If a monorepo is not an option, you can publish your schema and types as a package that can be installed in both projects. However, this setup would require a lot more maintenance work. Ultimately, as long as you can import your schemas and types from the client and server app, you are in good shape. Server-to-client validation and type-safety For the sake of simplicity, let's focus on data flowing from the server to the client for now. Generally speaking, the concepts also apply in reverse, as long as your JSON API server validates your inputs and outputs. We’ll look at the most basic version of having strongly typed data on the client from a request to our server. Type-safe client requests In our server application, if we validate the /users endpoint with a shared schema - on the client side, when we make the request to the endpoint, we know that the response data is validated using the user schema. As long as we are confident of this fact, we can use the generated type from that schema as the return type on our client fetch call. Here’s some pseudocode: ` Our server endpoint would look something like this: ` You could get creative and build out a map that defines all of your endpoints, their metadata, and schemas, and use the map to define your server endpoints and create an API client. Transforming data over the wire Everything looks stellar, but we can still take our efforts a bit further. To this point, we are still limited to serialized JSON data. If we have a created_at field (number or ISO string) tied to our user, and we want it to be a Date object when we get a hold of it on the client side - additional work and consideration are required. There are some different strategies out there for deserializing JSON data. The great thing about having shared schemas between our client and server is that we can encode our type information in the schema without sending additional metadata from our server to the client. Using format to declare type data In my initial JSON Schema blog post, I touched on the format field of the specification. In our schema, if the actual type of our date is a string in ISO8601 format, we can declare our format to be "date-time". We can use this information on the client to transform the field into a proper Date object. ` Transforming serialized JSON Data This can be a little bit tricky; again, there are many ways to accomplish it. To demonstrate the concept, we’ll use TypeBox to define our schemas as discussed above. TypeBox provides a Transform type that you can use to declare, encode, and decode methods for your schema definition. ` It even provides helpers to statically generate the decoded and encoded types for your schema ` If you declare your decode and encode functions for your schemas, you can then use the TypeBox API to handle decoding the serialized values returned from your JSON API. Here’s what the concept looks like in practice fetching a user from our API: ` Nice. You could use a validation library like Zod to achieve a similar result but here we aren’t actually doing any validation on our client side. That happened on the server. We just know the types based on the schema since both ends share them. On the client, we are just transforming our serialized JSON into what we want it to be in our client application. Summary There are a lot of pieces in play to accomplish end-to-end type safety. With the help of JSON Schema and TypeBox though, it feels like light work for a semi-roll-your-own type of solution. Another great thing about it is that it’s flexible and based on pretty core concepts like a JSON API paired with a TypeScript-based client application. The number of benefits that you can reap from defining JSON Schemas for your APIs is really great. If you’re like me and wanna keep it simple by avoiding GraphQL or other similar tools, this is a great approach....

Apr 17, 2024

6 mins

JSONTypeScript

Testing a Fastify app with the NodeJS test runner

Introduction Node.js has shipped a built-in test runner for a couple of major versions. Since its release I haven’t heard much about it so I decided to try it out on a simple Fastify API server application that I was working on. It turns out, it’s pretty good! It’s also really nice to start testing a node application without dealing with the hassle of installing some additional dependencies and managing more configurations. Since it’s got my stamp of approval, why not write a post about it? In this post, we will hit the highlights of the testing API and write some basic but real-life tests for an API server. This server will be built with Fastify, a plugin-centric API framework. They have some good documentation on testing that should make this pretty easy. We’ll also add a SQL driver for the plugin we will test. Setup Let's set up our simple API server by creating a new project, adding our dependencies, and creating some files. Ensure you’re running node v20 or greater (Test runner is a stable API as of the 20 major releases) Overview * index.js - node entry that initializes our Fastify app and listens for incoming http requests on port 3001 * app.js - this file exports a function that creates and returns our Fastify application instance * sql-plugin.js - a Fastify plugin that sets up and connects to a SQL driver and makes it available on our app instance Application Code A simple first test For our first test we will just test our servers index route. If you recall from the app.js code above, our index route returns a 501 response for “not implemented”. In this test, we're using the createApp function to create a new instance of our Fastify app, and then using the inject method from the Fastify API to make a request to the / route. We import our test utilities directly from the node. Notice we can pass async functions to our test to use async/await. Node’s assert API has been around for a long time, this is what we are using to make our test assertions. To run this test, we can use the following command: By default the Node.js test runner uses the TAP reporter. You can configure it using other reporters or even create your own custom reporters for it to use. Testing our SQL plugin Next, let's take a look at how to test our Fastify Postgres plugin. This one is a bit more involved and gives us an opportunity to use more of the test runner features. In this example, we are using a feature called Subtests. This simply means when nested tests inside of a top-level test. In our top-level test call, we get a test parameter t that we call methods on in our nested test structure. In this example, we use t.beforeEach to create a new Fastify app instance for each test, and call the test method to register our nested tests. Along with beforeEach the other methods you might expect are also available: afterEach, before, after. Since we don’t want to connect to our Postgres database in our tests, we are using the available Mocking API to mock out the client. This was the API that I was most excited to see included in the Node Test Runner. After the basics, you almost always need to mock some functions, methods, or libraries in your tests. After trying this feature, it works easily and as expected, I was confident that I could get pretty far testing with the new Node.js core API’s. Since my plugin only uses the end method of the Postgres driver, it’s the only method I provide a mock function for. Our second test confirms that it gets called when our Fastify server is shutting down. Additional features A lot of other features that are common in other popular testing frameworks are also available. Test styles and methods Along with our basic test based tests we used for our Fastify plugins - test also includes skip, todo, and only methods. They are for what you would expect based on the names, skipping or only running certain tests, and work-in-progress tests. If you prefer, you also have the option of using the describe → it test syntax. They both come with the same methods as test and I think it really comes down to a matter of personal preference. Test coverage This might be the deal breaker for some since this feature is still experimental. As popular as test coverage reporting is, I expect this API to be finalized and become stable in an upcoming version. Since this isn’t something that’s being shipped for the end user though, I say go for it. What’s the worst that could happen really? Other CLI flags —watch - https://nodejs.org/dist/latest-v20.x/docs/api/cli.html#--watch —test-name-pattern - https://nodejs.org/dist/latest-v20.x/docs/api/cli.html#--test-name-pattern TypeScript support You can use a loader like you would for a regular node application to execute TypeScript files. Some popular examples are tsx and ts-node. In practice, I found that this currently doesn’t work well since the test runner only looks for JS file types. After digging in I found that they added support to locate your test files via a glob string but it won’t be available until the next major version release. Conclusion The built-in test runner is a lot more comprehensive than I expected it to be. I was able to easily write some real-world tests for my application. If you don’t mind some of the features like coverage reporting being experimental, you can get pretty far without installing any additional dependencies. The biggest deal breaker on many projects at this point, in my opinion, is the lack of straightforward TypeScript support. This is the test command that I ended up with in my application: I’ll be honest, I stole this from a GitHub issue thread and I don’t know exactly how it works (but it does). If TypeScript is a requirement, maybe stick with Jest or Vitest for now 🙂...

Nov 29, 2023

5 mins

NodeJSTypeScriptTesting

How to Create Standalone Components in Angular

Angular has become one of the most popular frameworks to build web applications today. One of the key features of the framework is its component-based architecture, which allows best practices like modularity and reusability. Each Angular component consists of a template, a TypeScript class and metadata. In this blog post, we will dive deeper into standalone components, and we will explore the anatomy of an application based on them. For the demo application, we will create a card-like component which can be used to render blog posts in a web application. Prerequisites You'll need to have installed the following tools in your local environment: * The latest LTS version of Node.js is recommended. * Either NPM or Yarn as a package manager. * The Angular CLI tool(Command-line interface for Angular). Initialize the Project Let's create a project from scratch using the Angular CLI tool: ` This command will initialize a base project using some configuration options: * --routing. It will create a routing module. * --prefix corp. It defines a prefix to be applied to the selectors for created components(corp in this case). The default value is app. * --style css. The file extension for the styling files. * --skip-tests. Disable the generation of testing files for the new project. If you pay attention to the generated files and directories, you'll see an initial project structure including the main application module and component: ` Creating Standalone Components First, let's create the custom button to be used as part of the Card component later. Run the following command on your terminal: ` It will create the files for the component. The --standalone option will generate the component as _standalone_. Let's update the button.component.ts file using the content below. ` Pay attention to this component since it's marked as standalone: true. Starting with Angular v15: components, directives, and pipes can be marked as standalone by using the flag standalone. When a class is marked as _standalone_, it does not need to be declared as part of an NgModule. Otherwise, the Angular compiler will report an error. Also, imports can be used to reference the dependencies. > The imports property specifies the standalone component's template dependencies — those directives, components, and pipes that can be used within its template. Standalone components can import other standalone components, directives, and pipes as well as existing NgModules. Next, let's create the following components: card-title, card-content, card-actions and card. This can be done at once using the next commands. ` On card-title.component.ts file, update the content as follows: ` Next, update the card-content.component.ts file: ` The card-actions.component.ts file should have the content below: ` Finally, the card.component.ts file should be defined as follows: ` Using Standalone Components Once all Standalone components are created, we can use them without the need to define an NgModule. Let's update the app.component.ts file as follows: ` Again, this Angular component is set as standalone: true and the imports section specifies the other components created as dependencies. Then, we can update the app.component.html file and use all the standalone components. ` This may not work yet, since we need to configure the Angular application and get rid of the autogenerated module defined under the app.module.ts file. Bootstrapping the Application Angular provides a new API to use a standalone component as the application's root component. Let's update the main.ts file with the following content: ` As you can see, we have removed the previous bootstrapModule call and the bootstrapApplication function will render the standalone component as the application's root component. You can find more information about it here. Live Demo and Source Code Want to play around with this code? Just open the Stackblitz editor or the preview mode in fullscreen. Conclusion We’re now ready to use and configure the Angular components as standalone and provide a simplified way to build Angular applications from scratch. Do not forget that you can mark directives and pipes as standalone: true. If you love Angular as much as we do, you can start building today using one of our starter.dev kits or by looking at their related showcases for more examples....

May 12, 2023

4 mins

Angular

The 2025 Guide to JS Build Tools

The 2025 Guide to JS Build Tools In 2025, we're seeing the largest number of JavaScript build tools being actively maintained and used in history. Over the past few years, we've seen the trend of many build tools being rewritten or forked to use a faster and more efficient language like Rust and Go. In the last year, new companies have emerged, even with venture capital funding, with the goal of working on specific sets of build tools. Void Zero is one such recent example. With so many build tools around, it can be difficult to get your head around and understand which one is for what. Hopefully, with this blog post, things will become a bit clearer. But first, let's explain some concepts. Concepts When it comes to build tools, there is no one-size-fits-all solution. Each tool typically focuses on one or two primary features, and often relies on other tools as dependencies to accomplish more. While it might be difficult to explain here all of the possible functionalities a build tool might have, we've attempted to explain some of the most common ones so that you can easily understand how tools compare. Minification The concept of minification has been in the JavaScript ecosystem for a long time, and not without reason. JavaScript is typically delivered from the server to the user's browser through a network whose speed can vary. Thus, there was a need very early in the web development era to compress the source code as much as possible while still making it executable by the browser. This is done through the process of *minification*, which removes unnecessary whitespace, comments, and uses shorter variable names, reducing the total size of the file. This is what an unminified JavaScript looks like: ` This is the same file, minified: ` Closely related to minimizing is the concept of source maps#Source_mapping), which goes hand in hand with minimizing - source maps are essentially mappings between the minified file and the original source code. Why is that needed? Well, primarily for debugging minified code. Without source maps, understanding errors in minified code is nearly impossible because variable names are shortened, and all formatting is removed. With source maps, browser developer tools can help you debug minified code. Tree-Shaking *Tree-shaking* was the next-level upgrade from minification that became possible when ES modules were introduced into the JavaScript language. While a minified file is smaller than the original source code, it can still get quite large for larger apps, especially if it contains parts that are effectively not used. Tree shaking helps eliminate this by performing a static analysis of all your code, building a dependency graph of the modules and how they relate to each other, which allows the bundler to determine which exports are used and which are not. Once unused exports are found, the build tool will remove them entirely. This is also called *dead code elimination*. Bundling Development in JavaScript and TypeScript rarely involves a single file. Typically, we're talking about tens or hundreds of files, each containing a specific part of the application. If we were to deliver all those files to the browser, we would overwhelm both the browser and the network with many small requests. *Bundling* is the process of combining multiple JS/TS files (and often other assets like CSS, images, etc.) into one or more larger files. A bundler will typically start with an entry file and then recursively include every module or file that the entry file depends on, before outputting one or more files containing all the necessary code to deliver to the browser. As you might expect, a bundler will typically also involve minification and tree-shaking, as explained previously, in the process to deliver only the minimum amount of code necessary for the app to function. Transpiling Once TypeScript arrived on the scene, it became necessary to translate it to JavaScript, as browsers did not natively understand TypeScript. Generally speaking, the purpose of a *transpiler* is to transform one language into another. In the JavaScript ecosystem, it's most often used to transpile TypeScript code to JavaScript, optionally targeting a specific version of JavaScript that's supported by older browsers. However, it can also be used to transpile newer JavaScript to older versions. For example, arrow functions, which are specified in ES6, are converted into regular function declarations if the target language is ES5. Additionally, a transpiler can also be used by modern frameworks such as React to transpile JSX syntax (used in React) into plain JavaScript. Typically, with transpilers, the goal is to maintain similar abstractions in the target code. For example, transpiling TypeScript into JavaScript might preserve constructs like loops, conditionals, or function declarations that look natural in both languages. Compiling While a transpiler's purpose is to transform from one language to another without or with little optimization, the purpose of a *compiler* is to perform more extensive transformations and optimizations, or translate code from a high-level programming language into a lower-level one such as bytecode. The focus here is on optimizing for performance or resource efficiency. Unlike transpiling, compiling will often transform abstractions so that they suit the low-level representation, which can then run faster. Hot-Module Reloading (HMR) *Hot-module reloading* (HMR) is an important feature of modern build tools that drastically improves the developer experience while developing apps. In the early days of the web, whenever you'd make a change in your source code, you would need to hit that refresh button on the browser to see the change. This would become quite tedious over time, especially because with a full-page reload, you lose all the application state, such as the state of form inputs or other UI components. With HMR, we can update modules in real-time without requiring a full-page reload, speeding up the feedback loop for any changes made by developers. Not only that, but the full application state is typically preserved, making it easier to test and iterate on code. Development Server When developing web applications, you need to have a locally running development server set up on something like http://localhost:3000. A development server typically serves unminified code to the browser, allowing you to easily debug your application. Additionally, a development server will typically have hot module replacement (HMR) so that you can see the results on the browser as you are developing your application. The Tools Now that you understand the most important features of build tools, let's take a closer look at some of the popular tools available. This is by no means a complete list, as there have been many build tools in the past that were effective and popular at the time. However, here we will focus on those used by the current popular frameworks. In the table below, you can see an overview of all the tools we'll cover, along with the features they primarily focus on and those they support secondarily or through plugins. The tools are presented in alphabetical order below. Babel Babel, which celebrated its 10th anniversary since its initial release last year, is primarily a JavaScript transpiler used to convert modern JavaScript (ES6+) into backward-compatible JavaScript code that can run on older JavaScript engines. Traditionally, developers have used it to take advantage of the newer features of the JavaScript language without worrying about whether their code would run on older browsers. esbuild esbuild, created by Evan Wallace, the co-founder and former CTO of Figma, is primarily a bundler that advertises itself as being one of the fastest bundlers in the market. Unlike all the other tools on this list, esbuild is written in Go. When it was first released, it was unusual for a JavaScript bundler to be written in a language other than JavaScript. However, this choice has provided significant performance benefits. esbuild supports ESM and CommonJS modules, as well as CSS, TypeScript, and JSX. Unlike traditional bundlers, esbuild creates a separate bundle for each entry point file. Nowadays, it is used by tools like Vite and frameworks such as Angular. Metro Unlike other build tools mentioned here, which are mostly web-focused, Metro's primary focus is React Native. It has been specifically optimized for bundling, transforming, and serving JavaScript and assets for React Native apps. Internally, it utilizes Babel as part of its transformation process. Metro is sponsored by Meta and actively maintained by the Meta team. Oxc The JavaScript Oxidation Compiler, or Oxc, is a collection of Rust-based tools. Although it is referred to as a compiler, it is essentially a toolchain that includes a parser, linter, formatter, transpiler, minifier, and resolver. Oxc is sponsored by Void Zero and is set to become the backbone of other Void Zero tools, like Vite. Parcel Feature-wise, Parcel covers a lot of ground (no pun intended). Largely created by Devon Govett, it is designed as a zero-configuration build tool that supports bundling, minification, tree-shaking, transpiling, compiling, HMR, and a development server. It can utilize all the necessary types of assets you will need, from JavaScript to HTML, CSS, and images. The core part of it is mostly written in JavaScript, with a CSS transformer written in Rust, whereas it delegates the JavaScript compilation to a SWC. Likewise, it also has a large collection of community-maintained plugins. Overall, it is a good tool for quick development without requiring extensive configuration. Rolldown Rolldown is the future bundler for Vite, written in Rust and built on top of Oxc, currently leveraging its parser and resolver. Inspired by Rollup (hence the name), it will provide Rollup-compatible APIs and plugin interface, but it will be more similar to esbuild in scope. Currently, it is still in heavy development and it is not ready for production, but we should definitely be hearing more about this bundler in 2025 and beyond. Rollup Rollup is the current bundler for Vite. Originally created by Rich Harris, the creator of Svelte, Rollup is slowly becoming a veteran (speaking in JavaScript years) compared to other build tools here. When it originally launched, it introduced novel ideas focused on ES modules and tree-shaking, at the time when Webpack as its competitor was becoming too complex due to its extensive feature set - Rollup promised a simpler way with a straightforward configuration process that is easy to understand. Rolldown, mentioned previously, is hoped to become a replacement for Rollup at some point. Rsbuild Rsbuild is a high-performance build tool written in Rust and built on top of Rspack. Feature-wise, it has many similiarities with Vite. Both Rsbuild and Rspack are sponsored by the Web Infrastructure Team at ByteDance, which is a division of ByteDance, the parent company of TikTok. Rsbuild is built as a high-level tool on top of Rspack that has many additional features that Rspack itself doesn't provide, such as a better development server, image compression, and type checking. Rspack Rspack, as the name suggests, is a Rust-based alternative to Webpack. It offers a Webpack-compatible API, which is helpful if you are familiar with setting up Webpack configurations. However, if you are not, it might have a steep learning curve. To address this, the same team that built Rspack also developed Rsbuild, which helps you achieve a lot with out-of-the-box configuration. Under the hood, Rspack uses SWC for compiling and transpiling. Feature-wise, it’s quite robust. It includes built-in support for TypeScript, JSX, Sass, Less, CSS modules, Wasm, and more, as well as features like module federation, PostCSS, Lightning CSS, and others. Snowpack Snowpack was created around the same time as Vite, with both aiming to address similar needs in modern web development. Their primary focus was on faster build times and leveraging ES modules. Both Snowpack and Vite introduced a novel idea at the time: instead of bundling files while running a local development server, like traditional bundlers, they served the app unbundled. Each file was built only once and then cached indefinitely. When a file changed, only that specific file was rebuilt. For production builds, Snowpack relied on external bundlers such as Webpack, Rollup, or esbuild. Unfortunately, Snowpack is a tool you’re likely to hear less and less about in the future. It is no longer actively developed, and Vite has become the recommended alternative. SWC SWC, which stands for Speedy Web Compiler, can be used for both compilation and bundling (with the help of SWCpack), although compilation is its primary feature. And it really is speedy, thanks to being written in Rust, as are many other tools on this list. Primarily advertised as an alternative to Babel, its SWC is roughly 20x faster than Babel on a single thread. SWC compiles TypeScript to JavaScript, JSX to JavaScript, and more. It is used by tools such as Parcel and Rspack and by frameworks such as Next.js, which are used for transpiling and minification. SWCpack is the bundling part of SWC. However, active development within the SWC ecosystem is not currently a priority. The main author of SWC now works for Turbopack by Vercel, and the documentation states that SWCpack is presently not in active development. Terser Terser has the smallest scope compared to other tools from this list, but considering that it's used in many of those tools, it's worth separating it into its own section. Terser's primary role is minification. It is the successor to the older UglifyJS, but with better performance and ES6+ support. Vite Vite is a somewhat of a special beast. It's primarily a development server, but calling it just that would be an understatement, as it combines the features of a fast development server with modern build capabilities. Vite shines in different ways depending on how it's used. During development, it provides a fast server that doesn't bundle code like traditional bundlers (e.g., Webpack). Instead, it uses native ES modules, serving them directly to the browser. Since the code isn't bundled, Vite also delivers fast HMR, so any updates you make are nearly instant. Vite uses two bundlers under the hood. During development, it uses esbuild, which also allows it to act as a TypeScript transpiler. For each file you work on, it creates a file for the browser, allowing an easy separation between files which helps HMR. For production, it uses Rollup, which generates a single file for the browser. However, Rollup is not as fast as esbuild, so production builds can be a bit slower than you might expect. (This is why Rollup is being rewritten in Rust as Rolldown. Once complete, you'll have the same bundler for both development and production.) Traditionally, Vite has been used for client-side apps, but with the new Environment API released in Vite 6.0, it bridges the gap between client-side and server-rendered apps. Turbopack Turbopack is a bundler, written in Rust by the creators of webpack and Next.js at Vercel. The idea behind Turbopack was to do a complete rewrite of Webpack from scratch and try to keep a Webpack compatible API as much as possible. This is not an easy feat, and this task is still not over. The enormous popularity of Next.js is also helping Turbopack gain traction in the developer community. Right now, Turbopack is being used as an opt-in feature in Next.js's dev server. Production builds are not yet supported but are planned for future releases. Webpack And finally we arrive at Webpack, the legend among bundlers which has had a dominant position as the primary bundler for a long time. Despite the fact that there are so many alternatives to Webpack now (as we've seen in this blog post), it is still widely used, and some modern frameworks such as Next.js still have it as a default bundler. Initially released back in 2012, its development is still going strong. Its primary features are bundling, code splitting, and HMR, but other features are available as well thanks to its popular plugin system. Configuring Webpack has traditionally been challenging, and since it's written in JavaScript rather than a lower-level language like Rust, its performance lags behind compared to newer tools. As a result, many developers are gradually moving away from it. Conclusion With so many build tools in today's JavaScript ecosystem, many of which are similarly named, it's easy to get lost. Hopefully, this blog post was a useful overview of the tools that are most likely to continue being relevant in 2025. Although, with the speed of development, it may as well be that we will be seeing a completely different picture in 2026!...

Feb 14, 2025

12 mins

JavaScriptDevTools

Let's innovate together!

We're ready to be your trusted technical partners in your digital innovation journey.

Whether it's modernization or custom software solutions, our team of experts can guide you through best practices and how to build scalable, performant software that lasts.

Introduction to LitElement

What is LitElement?

JavaScript vs TypeScript

More about LitElement

Luis Aviles

You might also like

End-to-end type-safety with JSON Schema

Testing a Fastify app with the NodeJS test runner

How to Create Standalone Components in Angular

The 2025 Guide to JS Build Tools

Let's innovate together!

You might also like

End-to-end type-safety with JSON Schema

Testing a Fastify app with the NodeJS test runner

How to Create Standalone Components in Angular

The 2025 Guide to JS Build Tools